Opposition to parents spanking their children has been growing significantly in elite circles over the past few years. And, my blogs on spanking are among the most read of those I publish. Therefore, I’ve decided to, with the help of the research of my friends Den Trumbull, MD, S. DuBose Ravenel, MD, to look a the arguments used against spanking, to see if they hold any water. This is the sixth in a 12 part series.
Argument #5: Physical punishment makes the child angry at the parent.
All forms of punishment initially elicit a frustrated, angry response from a child.
However, progression of this anger is dependent primarily upon the parent’s attitude during and after the disciplinary event, and the manner of its application.
Any form of punishment administered angrily for purposes of retribution, rather than calmly for purposes of correction, can create anger and resentment in a child.
Actually, a spanking can break the escalating rage of a rebellious child and more quickly restore the relationship between parent and child.
You can read more of my blogs on spanking here:
By the way, an introduction is in order. Den A. Trumbull, MD is a board-certified pediatrician in private practice in Montgomery, Alabama. He is Vice President of the American College of Pediatricians. S. DuBose Ravenel, MD is a board-certified pediatrician in private practice in High Point, North Carolina. He served for 11 years on the pediatric faculty of the University of North Carolina School of Medicine prior to entering private practice.